Will An Injury Attorney In Stouffville Assess Crash With Vehicle In The Emergency Lane?

You might wonder whether the passing driver is the one at fault if there is a car crash on the road or an emergency lane. If so, then the vehicle was possibly partially on the road and partially in the path of the oncoming traffic, as the Injury Attorney in Stouffville finds. The lawyers help you to understand such a situation better besides assessing the fault. It is necessary to pay attention to the other vehicles on the road, irrespective of whether they are moving, or stopping at the scene of the accident for a reason.

Your Injury Attorney in Barrie answers all questions regarding the crash in the area that led to the injuries and damage. Several people pass the vehicles on the scene of the accident, which include emergency vehicles, police cars or any other vehicle. It becomes imperative to refer to the law regarding the best reaction to such vehicles. When approaching stationary vehicles, who have alternately flashing or warning signal lights switched on, the drivers should slow down as per the conditions. It is necessary to exercise caution when changing lanes is not possible. Another way is to give the right of the way, so you need to move in a non-adjacent lane if there is a stationary vehicle. It applies to the cars on the highway having minimum four lanes and those moving in the direction you are travelling.

Such laws apply on the emergency vehicles as the Injury Attorney in Normal explains. This includes ambulances and police cars with lights flashing as well as the non-emergency types with hazard lights turned on. The law covers other types of vehicles too, like tow trucks, construction vehicles, and assistance providers. Violating this law signifies hefty fines but crashing into such vehicles may cause life-threatening or fatal injuries to the people. In such accidents, the liability rests on the side of the driver who slammed into the stationary vehicle, as explained by the Injury Attorney in Stouffville.

The car who slammed the other vehicle pays for the damages incurred by the one in the breakdown lane. Violating the law of this lane makes proving innocence very difficult. Both the victim and the related insurer argue that it is the duty of the defendant to see the lights flashing and make the right decision. The switching on of the hazard lights of the vehicle on the emergency lane at the time of the crash is a strong argument. Then there are cases with a non-flashing hazard light. In such cases, assessing claims may become difficult. For daytime crashes, arguing that the defendant failed to see the vehicle standing there may not stand.

In such cases, as the Injury Attorney in Orillia says, the defendant’s side has partial blame for the fault. For nighttime crashes, however, holding a person liable in the same situation is more difficult. In areas with no street lights or which are poorly lit, seeing the vehicles standing there is difficult and this increases the chance of accidents.

Posted on